Legal Opinion
Rzayeva v. Foster
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 26, 2001No. 3:97CV01385AWTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Zhasmen Rzayeva, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action against the City of Hartford and two of its police officers. The plaintiff makes various First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as pendent state law claims, and the defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is being granted in part and denied in part. The sole claim remaining is the plaintiffs claim, as to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Hull v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Hull v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017