Legal Opinion
Betancourt v. Slavin
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 16, 2009No. Civ. 3:05CV1906 (HBF)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOLLY B. FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Lucas Betancourt, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Sergeant Michael Slavin, Lieutenant Edward Apicella, Officer Stanley Stasaitis and Detective William Howard Jones deprived him of constitutional rights secured by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 1 Plaintiff also alleges violations of state law as pendant claims to this action. 2
Pending is defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- K.D. ex rel. Duncan v. White Plains School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Brown v. Office of the State ComptrollerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Coan v. Madstar Mobile, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Coan v. Orlando Predators Sports Group, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Coan v. PearsallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.