Warr v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Tigree James Warr appeals his conviction for Possession of Cocaine,2 a Class D felony. We affirm.
ISSUE
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling Warr's motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop.
FACTS
On December 9, 1989 at 9:00 p.m., Indianapolis police officer Mark Nagy observed a van driving slowly without its headlights on. The van was in an area well-known for heavy narcotics activity and frequent shootings. The van proceeded to travel in a circle and made an unsignalled turn. Officer Nagy stopped the van…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Banks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- D.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.