Legal Opinion
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1994No. 65564PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 25, the records from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, the briefs and the oral arguments of counsel. Pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J) and R.C. 2945.67, the state of Ohio timely appeals from the lower court’s decision granting the motion to suppress evidence filed by defendantappellee, Randy L. Williams. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Det. Gary Garisek testified on behalf of the state of Ohio at appellee’s motion hearing. Det. Garisek has eight years of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. NguyenOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. QuinonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Atchley, 07ap-412 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. BarrettOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.