Legal Opinion
State v. Hollins
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1996No. 46A03-9512-CR-408PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge
The State of Indiana brings this appeal pursuant to Inp. Cope § 35-38-4-2(5) (1998) contesting the trial court's grant of Eugene Hollins' ("Hollins") motion to suppress illegally seized evidence. The State raises the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress.
We reverse and remand.
On late June 28 and early June 29, 1994, the Michigan City Police Department's ("MCPD") Drug Interdiction Team ("I-Team") was monitoring a home about which the MCPD had received several complaints concerning possible drug activity. The home was located in a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Trigg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. JoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Teer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Justice v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.