Legal Opinion
Breidenthal v. Grooms
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1932No. 21192PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRILEiY, J.
The parties hereto are in the same relation as in the trial court.
On February 20, 1922, one John Blott was the owner of the land involved in this action, being 10O acres more or less in section 12, township 3N., range 6W., in Grady county. On that date Blott executed a mineral deed to. defendants J. T. Grooms, I. K. Grooms, H. A. Furst, W. L. Brittain, and J. A. Brown, conveying an undivided one-sixteenth interest in and to all the oil, petroleum, gas, coal, asphalt, and all other mineralsi in and under or that might be produced from said land. The consideration expressed in the deed was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ramey v. StephneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Krutzfeld v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Adams v. MerrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rose v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Colonial Royalties Co. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Higgins v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Westcott v. BozarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Haynes v. HuntUtah Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.