Legal Opinion

Westcott v. Bozarth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1949No. 33456PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

W. F. Westcott claimed to be the owner of the fee-simple title in and to all of blocks 8 to 10, inclusive, in May Dell Tracts Addition to Oklahoma City, and brought an action to quiet title thereto.

Defendants, E. L. Bozarth and Ethel L. Bozarth, claim to be the owners of 15/16th of the mineral rights therein, and by way of cross-petition ask that the title in and to such interest be quieted in them.

The trial court denied plaintiff’s claim and rendered judgment in favor of defendants on their cross-petition quieting title in them in and to the mineral interest claimed.

Plaintiff appeals and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Carter Oil Company v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Beasley v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Echolustee Oil Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Jarrett v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Colonial Royalties Co. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Messner v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Lahman v. BasselSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Price v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API