Legal Opinion

Russell v. Szczawinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1935No. Docket No. 152, Calendar No. 37,373PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages against defendants alleged to have resulted from defendants’ negligence. Defendants appeal. Defendant Motor Freight, Inc., hired' defendant Szczawinski, the owner of a three and a half ton truck and defendant Szczawinski was the operator thereof between Detroit and Flint. At the time of the accident the truck was loaded with motor crank shafts. It became disabled and was stopped on the highway. Plaintiff, operating an automobile coming from the same direction, ran into the rear of the motor truck and was injured. Various questions are raised.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Holsaple v. Menominee Sup'ts of PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bowmaster v. William H. DePree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. People v. GoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Suarez v. KatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Harding v. BlankenshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API