Legal Opinion

In re Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Troy, Rensselaer County.

*1444By decision dated April 7, 2011, this Court found respondent guilty of professional misconduct and suspended him from the practice of law for a period of one year (Matter of Perry, 83 AD3d 1198 [2011]).

At the time our decision was issued, a supplemental petition of charges was pending against respondent. Respondent has not answered or otherwise replied to the supplemental , petition or to petitioner’s subsequent motion for a default judgment, both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re Van BenschotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re Van BenschotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API