In re Perry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Troy, Rensselaer County.
*1444By decision dated April 7, 2011, this Court found respondent guilty of professional misconduct and suspended him from the practice of law for a period of one year (Matter of Perry, 83 AD3d 1198 [2011]).
At the time our decision was issued, a supplemental petition of charges was pending against respondent. Respondent has not answered or otherwise replied to the supplemental , petition or to petitioner’s subsequent motion for a default judgment, both…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Van BenschotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Van BenschotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.