In re Perry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this *1199Court in 1994. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Troy, Rensselaer County.
After a hearing, the Referee sustained all of the charges set forth in the petition of charges against respondent. Petitioner now moves to confirm the Referee’s report. Respondent has not replied to the motion.
We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct with respect to seven client matters as charged and specified.* Respondent neglected five client matters in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 (a) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re O'BryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011