Legal Opinion

In re Van Benschoten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2014Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1976. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Village of Saugerties, Ulster County.

Following respondent’s failure to answer a petition of charges, dated December 4, 2013, containing 11 charges of professional misconduct with specifications, petitioner moved for a default judgment, which respondent opposed. Subsequently, by confidential order dated April 25, 2014, this Court granted petitioner’s motion to the extent of finding respondent guilty of charges I through III and VI through XI, excepting specification 3 of charge IX…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re LarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. In re EjimakorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API