Legal Opinion

In re Morisseau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 2014Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Second Department in 2005 and reportedly resides in West New York, New Jersey.

By decision dated November 4, 2010, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year (Matter of Morisseau, 78 AD3d 1321 [2010]). Her subsequent motion to vacate that suspension was denied. Since 2011, she has failed to comply with the attorney registration requirements. Petitioner now charges that respondent, in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 8.4 (b), (d) and (h), engaged in conduct that adversely reflects…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re DaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In Re MorisseauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. In re MorisseauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API