Rhoades v. Malta Vita Pure Food Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Assumpsit by Charles E. Rhoades against the Malta "Vita Pure Food Company for work and labor. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff, an expert in the manufacture of cereal flake foods and a millwright, brought suit against defendant for a balance of- salary claimed to be due him, filing, with his declaration on the common counts, a bill of particulars of his claim. The charges against defendant in the bill of particulars are:
To two years’ salary from Sept. 16, 1901, to Sept. 16, 1903, at $3,000.00 per year__________________$4,000 00
To materials furnished and provided by the plaintiff for the defendant in doing experimental work by the plaintiff for the defendant at its request, as follows: [Stating various…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Morgan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Citizens' Savings Bank v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Comstock v. DraperMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reiner v. North American Newspaper AllianceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Hoyt v. Paw Paw Grape Juice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Smilansky v. Mandel Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.