Legal Opinion
Smilansky v. Mandel Bros.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 109, Calendar No. 35,625PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
As the pleadings finally stand, this suit is by cross-plaintiff Mandel Brothers for judgment against defendant Elless Company and plaintiff on certain promissory notes executed by them, and for decree of foreclosure of real estate mortgage given by plaintiff to secure the notes. Mandel Brothers had decree for the whole amount claimed.
The question is whether cross-plaintiff, a foreign corporation not authorized to do business in this State, may maintain the suit.
August 9, 1922, cross-plaintiff contracted to -.sell and install furniture, furnishings, decorations, etc., to an approximate amount…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Seamans v. Temple Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- J. B. Simpson, Inc. v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gartland Steamship Co. v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Long Manufacturing Co. v. Wright-Way Farm Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.