Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Barbour
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, The Hocking Valley Railway Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 13th day of August, 1919, granting defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings consisting of the complaint and answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
The complaint alleges the sale by the plaintiff to the Central Locomotive and Car Works of certain gondola cars. It alleges that prior to that sale the plaintiff had entered into a contract with one Wardwell for the sale of 300 of said gondola cars. The two sales would leave about 50 cars belonging to the plaintiff unsold. It then alleges that after this contract with Wardwell and after the original contract with the plaintiff, the Central Locomotive and Car Works entered into an agreement for the purchase of all of the cars of the plaintiff, including the cars which had been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wheeler v. . BillingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Mills v. Dow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Rhoades v. Malta Vita Pure Food Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Feuer v. Menkes Feuer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Roberts v. CrissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Heckman v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- In re the Arbitration between Harold Levinsohn Corp. & Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt & Reefer Makers' UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.