Legal Opinion
Corneal v. Jackson Tp., Huntingdon County, Pa.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2003No. CIV.1:CV-00-1192PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs’ motion for partial reconsideration of the court’s order of December 23, 2002. The parties have briefed the issues, and the matters are now ripe for disposition.
I. Background
Plaintiffs, David and Sandra Corneal (“the Corneáis”), filed this case alleging the following: violations of their rights pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution (Count I); that Defendants engaged in a civil conspiracy in violation of Pennsylvania common law (Count…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Burton v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Giuliani v. Springfield TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.