Legal Opinion

Nieshe v. Concrete School District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 5, 2005No. 54451-9-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 We are asked to decide whether the superior court erred by sustaining a jury verdict in favor of Jennifer Nieshe on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, under which she argued that the Concrete School District denied her due process when it arbitrarily and capriciously excluded her from participating in a high school graduation ceremony. We conclude that the court erred, and reverse. Nieshe did not have a cognizable right under § 1983 because participation in a graduation ceremony is not a life, liberty, or property interest protected by the due process clause of the federal constitution.1

Baker, J.

I

|2…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Sequim Valley Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Dellen Wood Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Manna Funding, LLC v. Kittitas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API