Legal Opinion

Haley Ex Rel. Gash v. Pickelsimer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1964No. 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

“. . . when a litigant seeks relief under the declaratory judgment statute, he must set forth in his pleading all facts necessary to disclose the existence of an actual controversy between the parties to the action with regard to their respective rights and duties in the premises.” Lide v. Mears, 231 N.C. 111, 56 S.E. 2d 404; Insurance Co. v. Roberts, ante, 285, 134 S.E. 2d 697, and cases cited. Plaintiffs, in their complaint, did not disclose what controversy, if any, existed between them and defendants. Their complaint contains no reference whatever to a prior action. However, defendants…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rape v. LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. TannenbaumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Wells v. DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Peterson v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API