Wells v. Dickens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Assuming the truth of plaintiff’s allegations, the first question presented by this appeal is: Does the will of testatrix impose upon plaintiff the obligation to choose between a one-third interest in fee in the Cobb Farm and the fee in the one-third undivided interest in the property devised to him in Item 8 of testatrix’ will?
The complaint alleges: (1) Wells conveyed the Cobb Farm to testatrix by deed of gift. Before and at the time of the conveyance she agreed with him that she would hold the land for the benefit of Wells’ three children, subject to her use of it during her lifetime, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lamar v. McLarenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Rieves v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Schoolfield v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Wall v. SneedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.