Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0972(RMU)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying The Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, the National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB”), is an organization that represents builders, land developers and remodelers and strives to protect its members’ interest in preserving the broadest lawful use of their property. It brings a facial challenge to a permit issued by the defendant, 1 which regulates the discharge of dredged or fill materials into non-tidal upland ditches, as being beyond the authority granted to the defendant by the Clean…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Urban Health Care Coalition v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Prosser v. FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Prosser v. Federal Agriculture Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009