Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-0687Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY J. PROSSER, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civil Action No. 08-0687 (JR) : FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE : CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM The claim of pro se plaintiffs Jeffery Prosser and John Raynor1 against the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)is essentially that their financial support of the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) is unlawful because it keeps CFC afloat so that CFC is not forced through financial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API