Legal Opinion
Prosser v. FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 14, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0687 (JR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.
The claim of pro se plaintiffs Jeffery Prosser and John Raynor 1 against the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)is essentially that their financial support of the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) is unlawful because it keeps CFC afloat so that CFC is not forced through financial necessity to do business with the plaintiffs and aecommodate their business needs. CFC was originally named as a defendant, but plaintiffs conceded its motion to dismiss. Dkt. 14.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Youkelsone v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Coubaly v. Cargill, IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Farm-To-Consumer Legal Defense Fund v. SchaferDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Youkelsone v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010