Legal Opinion

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, People v Jordan, 62 NY2d 825, 826; People v Debo, 234 AD2d 944, 945, lv denied 89 NY2d 984) and that he was deprived of his right to due process of law as the result of preindictment delay (see, People v Cedeno, 52 NY2d 847, 848; People v Mike, 212 AD2d 999, 1000, lv denied 86 NY2d 738). We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. CedenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. DeboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. MikeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API