Legal Opinion

People v. Mike

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the photographic identification of defendant by the undercover officer who purchased cocaine from him was confirmatory in nature (see, People v Wharton, 74 NY2d 921, 922-923; People v Freeman, 176 AD2d 1090; People v Kearn, 118 AD2d 871), and that an in-court identification of defendant had an independent basis (see, People v Perez, 139 AD2d 460, affd 74 NY2d 637).

There is no merit to the contention that the court should have dismissed the present indictment because the charges contained therein were satisfied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. McCreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API