Legal Opinion

People v. Cedeno

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1981PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s only contention in our court is that the lapse of 13 months between his arrest and his arraignment on the indictment was an unreasonable delay in prosecution which constituted a denial of his constitutional right to due process in consequence of which his conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed (People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241; People v Staley, 41 NY2d 789). While defendant did make a motion to dismiss the indictment under CPL 30.30, he made no motion to dismiss based on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LiebermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. DudleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API