Legal Opinion

Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1975No. Nos. 74-428, 74-429, 74-430 and 74-431PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

Celebrezze, J.

The Tax Commissioner assessed the sales and use taxes in question in these cases to each of the individual joint venturers. Appellants argue that since the joint ventures were the consumers liable pursuant to R. C. 5739.13 (“* * * the commissioner may make assessment against either the vendor or the consumer”), only the joint ventures could properly be assessed.

Without entering into an extended discussion of the definitions involved in the applicable chapters of the Revised Code (5739 and 5741), it is clear that the joint ventures were the consumers.

*32While admitting that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Clark v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. R. Wantz & Sons Construction Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Busler v. D & H Manufacturing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Schaefer v. D & J Produce, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Funk v. HancockOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Grendell v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API