Legal Opinion

Busler v. D & H Manufacturing, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1992No. 91AP-1175PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

Plaintiff Lewis Busler 1 appeals from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment against him on the basis of the Statute of Frauds and the parol evidence rule. On appeal, plaintiff presents the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred in finding that there were no genuine issues of material fact.
“II. The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant.”

Plaintiff Lewis Busier assigned all of his right, title, and interest in a contract to purchase the stock of a privately held, close corporation called “D & H…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Biskupich v. Westbay Manor Nursing HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Al Johnson Construction Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Wall v. Firelands Radiology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. J.A. Industries, Inc. v. All American Plastics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API