Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bodley

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 24, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

This case is before the court on a motion of the complainant for a decree notwithstanding the defendant’s amended answer to her bill. A bond for $3500.00 and the accompanying mortgage to secure that debt, both dated October 8th, 1935, were executed by Royden Caulk and delivered to William Fortner, who was the. obligee and mortgagee named in those instruments. The mortgage was *220subsequently recorded in the proper office in New Castle County; apparently the bond was not entered. Some days later, William Fortner executed the following written instrument, under seal, and delivered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Becker v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  3. In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Morsman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  5. Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Otto v. GoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1947
  3. Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1943
  4. Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  5. Delaware Trust Co. v. FitzMauriceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API