Legal Opinion

Otto v. Gore

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 22, 2012No. C.A. Nos. 559, 2011, 582, 2011, 589, 2011PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

Acting as settlors, Wilbert and Genevieve Gore signed two separate trust instruments in 1972 — the “May Instrument” and the “October Instrument” — both purporting to transfer the same property into the “Pokeberry Trust.” Susan Gore, one of their daughters, claims that the earlier May Instrument controls while the other four siblings contend that the settlors never intended the May Instrument to be final and enforceable. The Vice Chancellor rejected Susan’s claims. Susan and her children (including Jan C. Otto, her adopted child), raise five arguments on appeal: (1) the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. In Re the Adoption of SwansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Annan v. Wilmington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Peden v. GraySupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rouner v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Frederick-Conaway v. BairdSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Pedrick v. RotenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  4. Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Haberland ex rel. Dex One Corp. v. BulkeleyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API