Legal Opinion
Jamice Carey v. Hector Crescenzi, Armando Crescenzi and Harenzy Realty Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 11, 1991No. 377, Docket 90-7453PublishedCited by 384 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Hector Crescenzi, Armando Crescenzi, and Harenzy Realty Corporation appeal from a summary judgment granted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kenneth Conboy, Judge. Rejecting the defendants’ argument that the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations, the district court determined that, as a matter of law, the two conveyances to the defendants were fraudulent under New York Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a. It further found that the plaintiff was entitled to attorneys’ fees under § 276-a of the same law.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Frybergh v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cohan v. MisthopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by384 opinions
- Dipilato v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Grace v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Aziz Zarif Shabazz v. PicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Lee v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Hill v. Rayboy-BrauesteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
379 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.