Legal Opinion
State v. Young
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 13, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] Floyd Young, Jr. appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Knox County, Kravchuk, J.) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of theft by deception in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A § 354 (1983). 1 Young argues that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that he failed to disclose the existence of a mortgage on property that he sold to the victims, Daniel and Kristie Bourkas. He also contends that reliance by the Bourkases on his alleged nondisclosure of the mortgage is an essential element of the crime of theft by deception, and that there was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. SaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ImesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Smith v. The City of Dothan, AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020