Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Imes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1993No. 3479 and 3480PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgments of sentence entered in these consolidated cases against Appellants Betty and Patrick Imes. Both Betty and Patrick (mother and son) were convicted in a non-jury trial of theft by deception 1 for their participation in, and ownership of, two carnival games. Post trial motions were filed and denied. Patrick was sentenced to one year probation and a $500 fine. Betty was sentenced to one year probation and a $300 fine. These appeals followed and were consolidated by stipulation. We reverse.

The facts which led to the arrest of Appellants involved a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. LinderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PappasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. SanchezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. GrifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API