Legal Opinion

State v. Casey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 6, 1996No. 34671-7-I, 34672-5-I, 34673-3-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C.J.

Richard Casey, Sr., Billy Joe Casey, and Richard Casey, Jr. (hereafter Casey) appeal their convictions for theft by deception, money laundering, and leading organized crime. They argue that (1). the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the jury on a defense of good faith claim of title, (2) five convictions for theft by deception were not supported by evidence of reliance, (3) insufficient evidence supported the convictions for money laundering and leading organized crime, and (4) cumulative error denied them a fair trial. We affirm, holding that the good faith claim of title defense…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. EppensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Charles S. CancelliereCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State v. KnutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. KNUTZCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. BriejerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. MehrabianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API