Legal Opinion
Doser v. Middlesex Mutual Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1980No. Civ. 55179PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Denise Doser, Dean Doser and Margaret Doser (Doser Heirs), as alleged assignees of a cause of action for bad faith breach of an insurance contract of the estate of Richard Harold Kelly (Estate), appeal from a judgment entered on March 28, 1978, in favor of defendant and respondent Middlesex Mutual Insurance Company (Middlesex).
Statement of the Case and Facts
The case underlying the instant appeal commenced several years ago with the untimely deaths of Richard Harold Kelly (Kelly) and Dean Doser (Doser) in November of 1972. At the time, Kelly was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.