Knapp I v. City of Jacksonville
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Jacksonville (the city) adopted a public safety surcharge (the surcharge). The city collected amounts from Plaintiffs (taxpayers) under the surcharge and then amended the ordinance imposing the surcharge (the ordinance as amended will be referred to as “the amended surcharge” and the two actions will be referred to collectively as “the surcharges”). The city has also collected amounts from taxpayers under the amended surcharge.
Taxpayers filed this action challenging the validity of the surcharges under Article XI, section 11 and section…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Swan Lake Moulding Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Huckaba v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knapp v. City of JacksonvilleOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Gall v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
- Haynie v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2008
- Knapp II v. City of JacksonvilleOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Haldeman v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4837 (or.tax 9-21-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.