Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court

Decided July 28, 2008No. TC 4790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Charles C. Haynie and Sandra E. Haynie (taxpayers) and the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Department of Revenue (the department). Defendant Hood River County Assessor (the county) filed an Answer but did not otherwise participate in the matter.

II. FACTS

The following facts have been stipulated by the parties. Taxpayers, who are husband and wife, own real property identified in the county's records as property tax account number 3572. The property is a single-family dwelling that was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Huckaba v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Flavorland Foods v. Washington County AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maddox v. Hood River County, Tc-Md 070349b (or.tax 3-10-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API