Legal Opinion

Kroeger v. Ford Motor Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1995No. S-93-334PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connolly, J..

Mertisha Kroeger appeals the directed verdict entered against her by the Douglas County District Court in her product liability action against the appellee, Ford Motor Company (Ford). Kroeger’s claim arose out of a one-car accident in which she was seriously injured while driving an automobile manufactured by Ford. Kroeger sued Ford under the theories of strict liability, negligence, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty. At the end of Kroeger’s case in chief, Ford made a motion for directed verdict, which the trial court sustained. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kudlacek v. Fiat S.P.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson v. MiskoNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Clearwater Corp. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McCurry v. School District of ValleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rohde v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wolf v. WaltNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hoeft v. Five Points BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wiekhorst Bros. Excavating & Equipment Co. v. LudewigNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API