Casado v. Melas Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
We note at the outset that the trial court’s conclusions that defendant was negligent and that its negligence proximately resulted in some damage to plaintiffs’ property are not challenged in this appeal. Here, plaintiffs appealed from a judgment in their favor because it awarded only nominal damages. As this Court recently held, a party who prevails at trial may appeal from a judgment that is only partly in its favor or is less favorable than the party thinks it should be. New Hanover Co. v. Burton, 65 N.C. App. 544, 310 S.E. 2d 72 (1983); G.S. 1-271. See also McCulloch v. R.R.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hester v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- McCullock v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Batts v. FaggartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- McEachern v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stutsman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- BSK Enters., Inc. v. Beroth Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Finkel v. FinkelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- 4U Homes & Sales, Inc. v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Shults v. Champion International Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.