Legal Opinion

BSK Enters., Inc. v. Beroth Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 2016No. 15-189PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*3 First, where the cost of remediation greatly exceeds or is disproportionate to the diminution in value of property, the measure of damages should be the diminution in value caused by the contamination. Second, plaintiffs have a compensable and protectable interest in the waters beneath their land and, therefore, have standing to bring an action to remediate groundwater contamination. Third, where there is no evidence presented at trial to support a defense regarding the duty to mitigate, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's request to give a duty to mitigate…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley and Joanne Crowley, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  3. Aqua North Carolina, Inc. v. Corteva, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
  4. Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. Brown v. Corteva, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API