Legal Opinion

Howe v. Hauge

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 2009No. A08-0908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

This appeal from summary judgment arises out of consolidated district court actions involving boundary-related disputes over registered land. Appellants argue that the district court improperly applied Minn.Stat. § 508.28, when it ruled that appellants were time-barred from challenging a registered land survey. Appellants also argue that the district court erroneously granted summary judgment to respondents, whose ownership claim of a peninsula was based on the registered land survey at issue. Respondents argue that appellants’ competing claim of ownership of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Myers Through Myers v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DolphinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Allan D. Hauge v. James Schowalter, Commissioner of Management and Budget, State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Ruikkie v. NallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API