Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Dolphin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 2009No. A09-689PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
On appeal from the confirmation of an arbitration award addressing the boundary line between two parcels of registered (Torrens) property, 1 appellants argue that (1) the only way to alter the boundary lines of Torrens property is by the process described in Minn.Stat. § 508.671 (2008); and (2) the district court erred by confirming the arbitrator’s factual findings and conclusions of law, which are not part of the narrow arbitrator’s award. We reverse based on the first argument and do not reach the second argument.
FACTS
This case arises from a property dispute over the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Brainerd National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bondy v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Independent School District No. 88 v. School Service Employees Union Local 284Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Britney v. Swan Lake Cabin Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Ruikkie v. NallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011