Legal Opinion
Etter v. Early Foundry Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
The plaintiffs are residents of New York State. The defendant is a foreign (Pennsylvania) corporation. The actions are to recover damages resulting from personal injuries alleged to have been received in the State of New York through the negligence of defendants employee.
The summons in each action was served on Joseph Early, vice-president of the defendant, in the city of New York. The defendant moved to vacate such service on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, alleging that the defendant was not doing business in the State of New York. (Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Amusement Securities Corp. v. Academy Pictures Distributing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- National Furniture Co. v. William Spiegelman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Loonsk Bros. v. MednickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Standard Foods Products Corp. v. Vinas Unidas S. ANew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Curran v. MatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Corrao v. Howard Sober, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.