Legal Opinion

Loonsk Bros. v. Mednick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an appeal from two orders of the Special Term, granting to defendant the right to examine certain persons, who are the officers of the plaintiff corporatidn, for the purpose of enabling defendant to resist a motion made by plaintiff for a temporary injunction.

Plaintiff is in the business of cleaning, pressing and dyeing clothes, and employed defendant to drive its truck in the business of gathering up and delivering the articles of clothing. The contract between the parties provides that, for two years after the cessation of defendant’s employment, he will not, either for himself or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Harriman v. PatonNew York Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Shumaker v. Doubleday, Page & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. De Maria v. GaidusekNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Etter v. Early Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Standard Foods Products Corp. v. Vinas Unidas S. ANew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Guimond v. Village of KeesevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API