Corrao v. Howard Sober, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGf. Robert Wither, J.
Plaintiff has moved to examine before trial by written interrogatories a doctor in North Carolina who treated plaintiff in New York for injuries sustained here. Defendant consents to such examination but asks that the order providing therefor contain the further provision that defendant at its option and own expense may, if it chooses, cross-examine the witness orally. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 302.)
Since presumably plaintiff knows substantially what the doctor’s testimony will be, and defendant will not know thereof until the doctor answers the questions on the direct examination, it is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Cole v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Etter v. Early Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Corporation Counsel v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Dayton v. FarmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Costin v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Ryan v. SaundersNew York Supreme Court · 1964