Legal Opinion

In re Vance

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1891No. 13594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in a

case of contempt, and the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that an appeal does not lie in such a case, because it is provided by the Code of Civil Procedure that “ the judgment and orders of the court or judge, made in cases of contempt, are final and conclusive.” In Tyler v. Connolly, 65 Cal. 30, the question is carefully considered, and the conclusion reached that no appeal lies from a judgment imposing a fine of more than three hundred dollars for a contempt of court, expressly overruling People v. O’Neil, 47 Cat. 109. Tyler v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tyler v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sanchez v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gale v. Tuolumne County Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In re the Estate of WittmeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Abbott v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. KuhlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Butler v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API