Legal Opinion

GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1980No. ID 2827PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2827 MATTER OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY In Visa Petition Proceedings SND-N-1730 Decided by Commissioner August 21, 1980 (1) A person who is qualified as a member of the professions qualifies as a person "of distinguished merit and ability" as that term is used in section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i). (2) Where a beneficiary is a member of the profession of civil engineering, the services are to be performed for a temporary - period of time, and the job offered requires the services of a professional engineer, whether or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. ESSEX CRYOGENICS INDUSTRIESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. CARON INTERNATIONALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Young China Daily v. ChappellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  3. MICHAEL HERTZ ASSOCIATESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  4. Hird/Blaker Corp. v. SavaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. LEEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API