Legal Opinion
BB & T v. Pender
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 28, 2005No. 26089Published
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BURNETT:
BB & T of South Carolina (Appellant) appeals a lower court order quashing a subpoena duces tecum, which Appellant issued to a nonparty prior to commencing any procedure to enforce a judgment. We certified the case for review from the Court of Appeals, pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We dismiss the appeal because the lower court order is not immediately appealable.1
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 14, 2003, Appellant filed a summons and complaint in the Lexington County Court of Common Pleas seeking a judgment against Kim A. Pender for debt collection. On March 14, 2003,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Express Freight Lines, Incorporated, Appeal of Christopher A. JansenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Municipal Ass'n v. AT & T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.