Legal Opinion
National City Bank of Minneapolis v. Ceresota Mill Ltd. Partnership
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1992No. C6-91-659PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMUANOYICH, Justice.
In this case we are asked to decide whether Minnesota courts may properly exercise personal jurisdiction over a California law firm being sued by a California resident over advice given in connection with a Minnesota property development project. We hold that the California firm had sufficient contacts with the state so that personal jurisdiction is authorized under Minnesota’s long-arm statute, Minn. Stat. § 543.19 (1990), and is consistent with the due process clause of the 14th amendment.
This third-party action arises from a lawsuit against the guarantors of bonds…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Datalink Corp. v. Perkins Eastman Architects, P.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Bergherr v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Krambeer v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.