Legal Opinion

Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 2003No. A03-174, A03-228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant James Juelich, a Minnesota resident, was injured by a seissor-lift table manufactured by respondent Meikikou. Juelich sued Meikikou, appellant Yama-zaki, the manufacturer of a component of the table, and appellant Mazak Corporation, an international distributor. The district court dismissed respondent Meikikou for lack of personal jurisdiction, and appellants challenge the dismissal in consolidated appeals. Because the district court did not err in concluding that there were insufficient contacts for personal jurisdiction and that respondent had not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Minnesota Public Radio v. Virginia Beach Educational Broadcasting Foundation, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  3. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API