Legal Opinion
Krambeer v. Eisenberg
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1996No. Civil 3-95-928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Mitchell S. Eisenberg’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant’s motion.
II. BACKGROUND
Defendant Mitchell Eisenberg is an attorney who lives and works in the state of Connecticut. He is not licensed to practice law in Minnesota, does not own property in Minnesota, and has never visited Minnesota. On or around July 19, 1995, Defendant, who apparently had been retained by the Leisure Romance Book Club (“the Club”),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Vlasak v. Rapid Collection Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Paulucci v. William Morris Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997